®
Copyright © 2012 - 2020 NU LIFE
DE
For which audience is the Parapulser® intendet? Until now, there were mainly the Dr. Beck and “Zapper” conaisseurs, who were concerned with electrical currents and induction. Regular users of older magnetic pulser will hardly bypass the Paraulser®, because time is our most precious good, and the Paraulser® gives it back with every single pulse. Take back your power and - take back your time! Due to its superior performance and frequency function, the Parapulser® has so versatile applications that it appeals to a much larger audience: from elite athletes to wellness centers, consciousness researchers. The innovative cost model adapts to individual performance needs. Nobody has to buy a pig in a poke. When should one consider an upgrade? Whoever is content with the eightfold performance over the previous magnetic pulser market leader for a slightly higher price, may come along for some time with the 2 Hz basic version. Owners of a Parapulser® can try the advantages of a maximum pulse rate risk-free, because every new device comes with a free quota of 200,000 pulses (about 33 power applications of ea. 6000 pulses @ 20 Hz) and can buy more powerpulses at low costs, if needed. However, the Parapulser® with its massive power is a true time saver, that’s why with regular use an upgrade to the Semipro or PRO version is a good investment. Is there a limit on the pulse rate, above which it could be potentially harmful? A negative effect is very unlikely in this dimensions. When the short term application has overwhealming benefits, a long term use should not yield anything negative. Counter-question: is a ride on a magnetic levitation train more harmful than on a little train? The pulser’s induced currents are anyway very weak, compared with direct blood electrification (micro amperage). Also, the beneficial effect of biological frequencies (Schumann 7.84 and Hood 10 Hz) should be considered. Why does one need magnetic treatment, apart from blood electrification? Due to the new possibility of inductive frequency treatment, this question became unnecessary in principle. The original advantage of pulsing lays in the local, concentrated effect of depth at which you can capture any part of the body immediately. Especially for (fur-covered) animals, blood electrification (with the miniZAP®) is often not an option. Is an 80fold pulse frequency increase a leap into a qualitatively new dimension? That’s what we believe! When the results with previous sub-Hertz pulsers partly failed to show up, then maybe, because their induction power is simply too low. A pulse every 4 seconds (0.2 Hz) may just be too slow to provoke an adequate cell response, let alone to perform a full body treatment in a reasonable way. An aircraft must also give full throttle to take off. Once it has risen, it can reduce the thrust. The situation is similar with induction treatment. Moreover, for the first time, certain harmonic-strengthening frequencies (such as the Schumann frequency of 7.84 Hz or the 10 Hz frequency) can be used to deeply penetrate the whole body and its energy centers. This opens a completely new research field. Does a faster pulse rate makes sense according to Dr. Beck? Of course! A strongest possible induction (locally induced current flow in the body) was Dr. Beck’s aim. This was directed to a photoflash discharge coil to reach a maximum speed change of magnetic field in the coil, and a correspondingly high induction current . Of course its resources and knowledge in 1995 were still very limited. In the last 20 years, electronic devices have developed into new dimensions and allow the complex connectivity with a previously considered technically impossible for power as the 20 Hz of the Parapulsers . How did it come to the fantasy figures of some manufacturers of 20,000, resp. 40,000 gauss field strength (2, resp. 4 Tesla)? This misleading information is based on purely theoretical calculations of the field strength in the coil core , which is already reduced already at the coil surface to 6,000 gauss ( 0.6 T). Dr. Beck himself had not even a Tesla meter . The Canadian partner of Dr. Beck , SOTA Instruments , wrote in a forum post: "Back in 1995 when i met Bob Beck , he had just designed the first Camera Photo Flash Magnetic Pulser using a Vivitar flash accessory . Bob's like pulser which never actually tested for the Gaussian output . Bob did not have a Tesla Meter - . Which is used to measure the output of Gauss magnetic pulsers." Ist eine schnellere Pulsrate im Sinne von Dr. Beck? Selbstverständlich. Es ging Dr. Beck um möglichst starke Induktion (lokal induzierter Stromfluss im Körper). Dafür hat er eine Fotoblitzentladung auf eine Spule gelenkt, um maximal schnelle Magnetfeldänderung in der Spule und einen entsprechend hohen Induktionsstrom zu erreichen. Natürlich waren seine Mittel und Kenntnisse 1995 noch sehr begrenzt. In den letzten 20 Jahren haben sich elektronische Bauteile in neue Dimensionen entwickelt und ermöglichen im komplexen Zusammenspiel mit Software eine bisher für technisch unmögliche gehaltene Leistung wie die 20 Hz des Parapulsers. Wie kommt es zu den Phantasiezahlen einiger Anbieter von 20.000, bzw. 40.000 Gauss Feldstärke (2, bzw. 4 Tesla)? Diese irreführenden Angaben beruhen auf rein theoretischen Berechnungen der Feldstärke im Spulenkern, die schon bereits an der Spulenoberfläche auf 6.000 Gauss (0,6 T) reduziert ist. Dr. Beck selbst hatte noch nicht mal ein Teslameter. Der kanadische Partner von Dr. Beck, SOTA Instruments, schrieb in einem Forumsbeitrag: “Back in 1995 when I met Bob Beck, he had just designed the first Camera Photoflash Magnetic Pulser using a Vivitar flash accessory. Bob's mag pulser was never actually tested for the Gauss output. Bob did not have a Teslameter - which is used to measure the Gauss output of magnetic pulsers.” Some competitors also advertise with a high pulse rate or voltage. Where's the difference? It depends not only on the frequency, but on the overall performance, which depends to both pulse rate and pulse strength (see comparison). It is useless to increase the frequency at the expense of pulse strength and vice versa. Increasing the frequency at constant intensity turned out to be a fascinating technological challenge. Among other things, the enormous heat development had to be avoided. The coil head of the Parapulser® stays lukewarm even after 6000 pulses. Advertising high primary values ​​(such as a high voltage capacitor, etc.) is downright misleading, as long as the resulting values ​​are not disclosed. We will publish an accurate comparative measurement of the total induction of various magnetic pulsers, by which even a layman can easily separate the wheat from the chaff. What's up with north and south polarity? The magnetic polarity acts in addition to induction. See application. What “magic” is driving the Parapulser®? Even though its performance contrasts strongly against the sub-Hertz pulsers, the explanation is not very difficult. The Parapulser® has a very advanced charging technology, where the cooperation between hard and software is perfectly tuned. Self-speaking, the power supply is also much stronger. In the past 5 years, much has been done regarding availability of heavy duty electronic parts. Maggnetic pulsers have ever since lived an lonely life in the “scene”, which is overlooked by bigger investors and developers, although the feedbacks are quite often nothing short from phenomenal. In this respect, since the first flash experiments of physicist Dr. Robert Beck († 2002), enormous development potential had been left unexploited and finally recovered through the Parapulser®. Are there further performance gains in prospect? From the existing hardware, an estimated 10-20% additional power could be taken out. The next step (increasing the pulse rate to 40 Hz) is possible, but not before 2014, and of course at a higher price. At this moment, it would be the cheapest solution to use two pulsers simultaneously. ;-)
FAQ